January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
| Aromatherapy 45 | [RSS] |
| Bullshit 50 | [RSS] |
| Day to Day 167 | [RSS] |
| Geocaches 4 | [RSS] |
| Projects 11 | [RSS] |
| Software 120 | [RSS] |
| Squirrel Thursday 31 | [RSS] |
| Technology 95 | [RSS] |
BLOGS & Friends Pages
Work From Home Smart
Honest Tunes Radio
Mad Geek!!!
Damn Interesting
hecker’s blizzog
EINSTEIN@HOME FreeBSD
Team FreeBSD HOME
Team FreeBSD Stat Page
Join Team FreeBSD
Interesting Web Sites
IPac - Culture & Technology
Cache-A-Maniacs
One Dollar BLOGS
Nature's Gift
Clientcopia
Links Visited Daily
Worse Than Failure
Forever Geek
Neatorama
Engadget
Boing Boing
Gizmodo
Hack a Day
My Content and Media
Myside's Geocaching Stats
My Shared RSS Snippets
A Picture of Me
My last.fm Home
Geeky, Funny, Strange
Wish List
Casio Wave Ceptor Watch
Nokia N800 Internet Tablet
If I am on-line and you want to chat in real time, or if I am off-line and you want to leave a message with my local IM program, allow pop-ups, then :::
This is the lamest squirrel thursday content I have found on the net, so I decided to leave the good ones for a later time.
"Now, the BASB are going to play "Smoke on the water" by Deep Purple, hope you enjoy it!"
A year ago I was writing:
the firefox computer - a dedicated internet and web 2.0 device
Just as the title says. The webserver on the other hand is hosted with Ubuntu Server... just a very short Blog note. :-D
--
to edit: SMTP for all my hosts and clients are also now on a FreeBSD host...
Random Thought : oh I would go for a port over a cheap beer anytime...
A year ago I was writing:
their here...
it's been a busy night, but BLOG space is available to those whom inquirer
The Yahoo! Mail Blog explains croaking SMTP service handling. Thank you for your honesty and understandable explanation:
" February 22, 2008 on 4:22 pm | In All-New Mail, Classic Mail, General |
Over the past few weeks some of our POP users have experienced varying delays when sending Yahoo! Mail messages via email clients (such as Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Thunderbird, Apple Mail, etc.). We understand that this has been frustrating, and sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
Recently we began experiencing an unexpected increase in traffic through the servers we have dedicated for POP/SMTP messages. When we first became aware that some users were having their messages delayed because of this we examined the issue, and the initial solution appeared to have the problem under control. However we soon learned that more needed to be done to ensure the levels of service we strive to provide.
As a result we spent the last several days not only upgrading hardware resources for our SMTP servers, but also restructuring the way the bandwidth of these servers is allocated. We are confident that this solution will not only resolve the immediate problems, but also ensure that the systems are even more reliable in the future."...
This was posted about 11 hours after my message to the Yahoo! Mail mailing list. Here is the post:
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:58:34 -0600
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 15:12 -0500, Sasafrass wrote:
> Ryan said they're working on it, so we just have to be patient.
>
"I know many of you are very dedicated Yahoo! Mail users and do take
advantage of their services.
However, I would like to make a few notes on the progression of their
new mail platform.
First I will start by pointing out the numerous problems with the new
client which was released out of BETA, a surprise to me, and out of the
blue, before it had any functionality that the developers probably
pictured as an accomplished project.
This decision reasoning is still unclear to me.
For my main point: would you install a 10,000 watt bulb in an efficiency
apartment, when a 50 watt light bulb would do?
So Yahoo! now gives us unlimited storage. Even before this, their
network backbone was not efficient enough to use their mail for urgent
communication.
Now mailbox limitations are gone, unused accounts are being flooded, and
users are in the position to send and receive mail carelessly with large
attachments, and 2,000 messages a day mailing lists.
For several years, on the SMTP side of inbound mail, they have been
"just barely keeping up". In the last couple years it has become worse,
and I find that my outbound mail is being deferred or given notice that
their mail servers are temporarily unavailable or too busy.
Can you just imagine a company of this size receiving all this mail?!
It's an amazing feat that delivery is mostly delayed from an hour too
four hours. Some go through right away, which may be a mechanism of
external mail servers adapting to it's success with SENT mail.
In any case, I feel Yahoo! Mail is a toy for certain communities in the
company whom are not interested in making an end product that could
possibly keep up to their status in the web based e-mail game. Visions
of chocolate water fountains (I want one).
So this is not related to patients. It's a project with too great of
expectations, assumptions of its usefulness, and the IT/IS and hardware
to support it.
I am now asking. Can we get a clear explanation - honest, with what may
have gone wrong with Yahoo! Mail, and the results you were expecting?
I know their is no such user agreement. However, hosting companies tell
you when something goes wrong, HD arrays went down, databases are
unavailable, you accidental received the wrong e-mail destined for their
users, and EXPLAIN, COMMUNICATE, AND RESPOND to concerns, questions, and
provide a support system; a blog is a good way of communicating such
information.
This computer world isn't perfect, so why is Yahoo! so self indulged?
I wrote this, because your word "patients" angered me. A 6 year mail
user, and 4 year Mail Plus customer.
I have left long ago for primary use, but follow this list out of the
craziness of their conception of what humans want to have their brains
filled with. Look at the Yahoo! Mail BLOG, in relation.
I will stop ranting now.
Andy"
I hope to see more Blog posts such as this so I can become more personal with the companies situations and practices.
A year ago I was writing:
Master Lock Master Key Shim from a 12oz Can of Cold Beer
A year ago I was writing:
ML-1740 is a friend of Tux - Laser printer built to last and designed to function with Linux
I have been using Pine joyously for the past few months, until today when I switched over to Evolution.
It was not my intention to do so. I was having difficulty using GnuPG to encrypt outgoing mail. I could sign the messages just fine, but I ended up spending an enormous amount of time trying to encrypt to recipients. I wanted to run a couple tests.
That's when it happened. Evolution started it's wizard and I was faced with the option of importing my mail and contacts from pine into Evolution mail.
I have had my off and on streaks with Evolution, and I never stayed a dedicated end user for very long. However, allowing myself an SSH TightVNC tunnel sparked my intention to give it a shot.
It did as it said it would. About 35,000 messages (5 1/2 years archive) and a couple hundred contacts conversions, I was in a position to use it as my full fledged e-mail client from the start.
I would have never thought, not a one to one synapse connection, that I would be able to import my MBOX style archives into a full fledged productivity suite. So their it be, Evolution Mail imports PINE stored mail and contact information. Wowsers.
It has come a long way since I last had a look at it. PGP works as it should, and I am confronted with various features that I could have taken advantage of the past several months.
I do not regret it one bit, swithing to Alpine. Pine was my first e-mail client, and it was a beautiful re-association.
A year ago I was writing:
the hair of human sexuality - why do we have pubic hair, serious
HOWTO: wiring diagram for straight through cables, crossover cables and rollover cables RJ-45
Ok, so their not the classic aroma therapist's tool, nor are the scents therapeutic, but they do smell.
Grape, cherry, and strawberry are your three choices. It's not Sandalwood, but at the same time it's not aged dead fish!
[gizmodo]
[Bullshit] [Aromatherapy]
The beginning of my passion for Sandalwood started from finding that this oil, and Frankincense contain sesquiterpenes.
Sesquiterpenes increase the oxygen in the brain up to 28% and is known to pass the blood brain barrier oxygenating the penal and pituitary glands.
If you have never sampled true Sandalwood, here is a link to a vial, somewhat adulterated, but a very intense and spiritual aroma at an affordable price (Sandalwood Absolute).
(GC/MS)
A year ago I was writing:
Chad Vader of the Willy St. CO-OP